<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly Mutual Fund Review: CGM Realty Fund (CGMRX)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://genxfinance.com/weekly-mutual-fund-reviewcgm-reality-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://genxfinance.com/weekly-mutual-fund-reviewcgm-reality-fund/</link>
	<description>Helping a unique generation achieve financial independence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://genxfinance.com/weekly-mutual-fund-reviewcgm-reality-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://genxfinance.com/2007/01/19/weekly-mutual-fund-reviewcgm-reality-fund/#comment-801</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Sun, the Focus fund was great when it was a mid-cap fund, but the style drift to large has not done it any favors. And since it is a blend fund I think the growth components are what have been holding it back the last year.

That is why I like the Realty fund because it is held to an 80/20 asset mix mandated by the SEC, requiring 80% of assets in real estate stocks or REITs. This constrains the style a bit and requires the manager to work within that framework which is probably why it has had more consistent long-term returns when compared to a fund that is allowed to completely change style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Sun, the Focus fund was great when it was a mid-cap fund, but the style drift to large has not done it any favors. And since it is a blend fund I think the growth components are what have been holding it back the last year.</p>
<p>That is why I like the Realty fund because it is held to an 80/20 asset mix mandated by the SEC, requiring 80% of assets in real estate stocks or REITs. This constrains the style a bit and requires the manager to work within that framework which is probably why it has had more consistent long-term returns when compared to a fund that is allowed to completely change style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun</title>
		<link>http://genxfinance.com/weekly-mutual-fund-reviewcgm-reality-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://genxfinance.com/2007/01/19/weekly-mutual-fund-reviewcgm-reality-fund/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>I own CGM Focus fund which, as the Realty fund, is very volatile as well. When I bought the fund five years ago, it was a small-/mid-cap fund and now it&#039;s a large blend according to Morningstar and its performance started to lag benchmark. I am considering dump this fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own CGM Focus fund which, as the Realty fund, is very volatile as well. When I bought the fund five years ago, it was a small-/mid-cap fund and now it&#8217;s a large blend according to Morningstar and its performance started to lag benchmark. I am considering dump this fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 5/9 queries in 0.002 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 252/252 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.genxfinance.com

Served from: genxfinance.com @ 2012-05-23 21:50:42 -->
